NCLT, NCLAT and DRAT case notes grounded in the original orders. Find the operative ruling, the reasoning that supports it and the limits that matter in practice.
39 articles · Explore all judgment analysis
Publication dates describe our articles; order dates describe the underlying decisions. Source-check dates record the verification described in each note.
39 articles · Page 3 of 4
Suraksha Realty Ltd. v. Amit Gupta Resolution Professional of Mahavir Roads and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Suraksha Realty: NCLAT distinguished pending proceedings from the conviction limb of Section 29A, while examining what the CoC knew before approval.
Mr. Dinesh Keshawrao Atkare and Mr. Madan Keshawrao Atkare v. Ms. Palak Swapnil Desai
Atkare v Desai: financing records, inspections and unexplained substitution supported Section 66 contribution; a mere discrepancy alone was not the test.
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority and New Okhla Industrial Development Authority v. Anand Sonbhadra et al.
NCLAT distinguished contingent priority for unearned increase from an unconditional charge for authority dues in the Subhkamna lease appeals.
Shailendra Kataria v. Manish Lalji Dawda, RP of Wadhwa Buildcon LLP
NCLT Mumbai upheld re-verification of unsupported homebuyer claims in Wadhwa Buildcon on 11 September 2026, preserving the limit on an RP’s adjudicatory powers.
Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Deepak Kumar Garg
NCLAT dismissed Paschimanchal’s delayed appeal: internal approvals and claimed merits could not enlarge the statutory condonation window.
Sujay Shankar Mukherjee v. Ashish Chawchharia, Resolution Professional of Riverbank Developers Private Limited
Hiland Greens: NCLT Kolkata’s 10 September 2026 order on conditional cancellation, an alternative flat, CoC approval and refund relief during CIRP.
Pink City Fincap Private Limited v. Arthmate Tech Private Limited
Pink City v Arthmate: NCLT examined who held early-redemption rights, maturity at the filing date, interest reconciliation and a failed Section 65 penalty request.
Kamlesh Rani Singla v. Praveen Kumar Garg and Mr. Gautam Singhal
Kamlesh Rani Singla: NCLAT quashed Delhi proceedings where the corporate CIRP was pending in Chandigarh, leaving liberty to approach the proper forum.
In re SRS Real Estate Ltd. and SRS Retreat Services Ltd., application of RP Shyam Arora
NCLT Chandigarh rejected SRS’s plan over differential homebuyer pricing, valuation defects and incomplete claims. Read the 9 September 2026 order and its limits.
Sandhya and Co & Anr v. Jain Housing and Constructions Limited
NCLT Chennai restored Jain Housing’s CIRP on 8 September 2026, appointed a new RP and sought a report instead of ordering immediate liquidation.
Aditya Raheja v. Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. & Ors
Aditya Raheja v Omkara: NCLT’s 3 September 2026 order distinguishes disputed debt figures from a supported perjury-referral case and preserves the CrPC/BNSS posture.
Mr. Rajendra M. Ganatra v. Mr. Atul Shamji Bharani & Others
Sunshine Housing: NCLT Mumbai examined same-day CCD conversion/redemption, preference evidence and a successor RP’s enlarged avoidance application.
