NCLT, NCLAT and DRAT case notes grounded in the original orders. Find the operative ruling, the reasoning that supports it and the limits that matter in practice.
39 articles · Explore all judgment analysis
Publication dates describe our articles; order dates describe the underlying decisions. Source-check dates record the verification described in each note.
13 articles · DRAT · Page 1 of 2
M/s Ghanshyam Lal Filling Station & Ors. v. UCO Bank
DRAT Delhi’s Ghanshyam Lal ruling explains why refunded auction proceeds did not satisfy the debt, and what evidence mattered in the recovery appeal.
Smt. Laxmi Mishra v. Indian Bank
DRAT credited Laxmi Mishra’s unrefunded deposit to a new appeal and ordered a prompt stay decision. The possession protection was expressly limited.
M/s Multani Oil Mill and others v. Federal Bank Financial Services Limited
Multani Oil Mill received liberty to implead the auction purchaser and seek protection. DRAT did not itself restrain transfer or invalidate the sale.
K. Raghu Rama Krishna Raju v. Canara Bank
Raju permits a confined application about receipt of legible OA papers. It does not automatically admit the written statement or decide recovery.
The Authorized Officer, Central Bank of India v. M/s A.R.A. Fuel Station
A.R.A. Fuel Station explains why DRAT remanded for bank objections, a later possession notice and a merits hearing instead of deciding enforcement.
B. Thirugnanam, Jothi and T. Ganavigneshwar v. The Authorized Officer, Five-Star Business Finance Limited
DRAT reduced Thirugnanam’s payment direction to ₹15 lakh but left the stay decision to DRT. Read the distinction from appellate pre-deposit.
V. Ajayakumar and U. Nithya v. Federal Bank Limited and another
DRAT Chennai's 21 October 2026 Ajayakumar order explains why later farm certificates and inspections failed to prove a SARFAESI Section 31(i) exemption.
State Bank of India v. Laxmi Devi and another
DRAT Delhi set aside a direction compelling SBI to accept a particular OTS. Read what remained for trial and why bank settlement rules mattered.
M/s Glaxy Education Society v. M/s Varthana Finance Private Limited and others
Glaxy separates an appeal’s condoned 89-day delay from an SA limitation remand. Read the 21October 2026 order without overstating the relief.
The Authorised Officer, JANA Small Finance Limited v. Yoganada Swamy TA and Shalini S
DRAT Chennai remanded Jana’s service dispute after considering affixture and publication evidence. The remaining SARFAESI merits were left open.
PNB Housing Finance Limited v. State Bank of India and another; Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited substituted as appellant
DRAT substituted Kotak for PNB Housing and sent institutional sale-proceeds disputes to conciliation or arbitration, without deciding entitlement.
Jiffy Realtors Private Limited and connected appellants v. Indian Overseas Bank and others
DRAT Delhi's 14 October 2026 Jiffy Realtors order required pre-deposit for procedural appeals, reducing it to 35% without deciding the appeals' merits.
