NCLT, NCLAT and DRAT case notes grounded in the original orders. Find the operative ruling, the reasoning that supports it and the limits that matter in practice.
39 articles · Explore all judgment analysis
Publication dates describe our articles; order dates describe the underlying decisions. Source-check dates record the verification described in each note.
39 articles · Page 2 of 4
Jiffy Realtors Private Limited and connected appellants v. Indian Overseas Bank and others
DRAT Delhi's 14 October 2026 Jiffy Realtors order required pre-deposit for procedural appeals, reducing it to 35% without deciding the appeals' merits.
Deepak Kumar Goyal v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Deepak Kumar Goyal v IBBI: consultation records and prior instructions remained mandatory, but NCLAT remanded the cancellation penalty for reconsideration.
Rajesh Harikishan Khandelwal v. Jay Ambe Industries & Anr.
Khandelwal v. Jay Ambe: how returned goods and earlier WhatsApp complaints defeated Section 9 admission, and why the commercial merits remained undecided.
Paramjeet Mor v. Punjab National Bank and others
Paramjeet Mor shows how earlier service records and missing objections defeated a late non-supply plea. DRAT upheld written-statement closure.
Dickey Special Situation Investment Trust-DSSF Series 2 v. Mr. Manish Agarwal, Committee of Creditors of Worlds Window Exim Private Limited and Mr. Sandeep Chandna
Dickey v Manish Agarwal: NCLAT upheld plan rejection for a missing cause-of-default explanation, while correcting the valuation and assignee-entitlement reasoning.
Debashis Nanda v. Stakeholders' Consultation Committee
Debashis Nanda: NCLAT applied the saving for an already-commenced going-concern sale, treating the liquidation order rather than auction notice as decisive.
Tata Capital Limited v. Mr. Sanjay Mahajan
Tata Capital v. Sanjay Mahajan: why security and Form D did not establish timely election, with the historical 30-day rule separated from the 2026 amendment.
Prateek Jain v. Mr. Anurag Nirbhaya, M/s. Red Apple Buyers Welfare Association, SRA Society and M/s. Windsor Paradise Heights Pvt. Ltd.
Prateek Jain: NCLAT rejected this shareholder-only plan appeal and unsupported fraud allegations; homebuyers could not substitute support for their own challenge.
Mr. Dhananjay Sanjay Agrawal v. Mr. Jigar Tarunkumar Bhatt, RP of Raninga Paper Mills Private Limited
Raninga Paper Mills: NCLT Ahmedabad distinguished an unpaid invoked guarantee from undischarged-insolvent status, with MSME and limited-standing qualifications.
Alliance Advertising and Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Eduisfun Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
NCLT Mumbai dismissed a mixed-invoice Section 9 petition after refusal to amend Form 5. Learn how default dates, acknowledgments and interest affected the case.
Punjab National Bank v. Reji Abraham
PNB v Reji Abraham: NCLT Chennai’s 23 September 2026 jurisdiction ruling on foreign borrowers, Chennai residence and a Section 95 personal-guarantor petition.
Affle 3i Limited v. Axis Trustee Services Limited
Affle 3i v Axis Trustee: CIRP admission remained intact, with liberty to place a supported Section 65 application before NCLT and locus left open.
