NCLT, NCLAT and DRAT case notes grounded in the original orders. Find the operative ruling, the reasoning that supports it and the limits that matter in practice.
Publication dates describe our articles; order dates describe the underlying decisions. Source-check dates record the verification described in each note.
Mr. Dhananjay Sanjay Agrawal v. Mr. Jigar Tarunkumar Bhatt, RP of Raninga Paper Mills Private Limited
Raninga Paper Mills: NCLT Ahmedabad distinguished an unpaid invoked guarantee from undischarged-insolvent status, with MSME and limited-standing qualifications.
Alliance Advertising and Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. Eduisfun Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
NCLT Mumbai dismissed a mixed-invoice Section 9 petition after refusal to amend Form 5. Learn how default dates, acknowledgments and interest affected the case.
PNB v Reji Abraham: NCLT Chennai’s 23 September 2026 jurisdiction ruling on foreign borrowers, Chennai residence and a Section 95 personal-guarantor petition.
Shailendra Kataria v. Manish Lalji Dawda, RP of Wadhwa Buildcon LLP
NCLT Mumbai upheld re-verification of unsupported homebuyer claims in Wadhwa Buildcon on 11 September 2026, preserving the limit on an RP’s adjudicatory powers.
Pink City Fincap Private Limited v. Arthmate Tech Private Limited
Pink City v Arthmate: NCLT examined who held early-redemption rights, maturity at the filing date, interest reconciliation and a failed Section 65 penalty request.
In re SRS Real Estate Ltd. and SRS Retreat Services Ltd., application of RP Shyam Arora
NCLT Chandigarh rejected SRS’s plan over differential homebuyer pricing, valuation defects and incomplete claims. Read the 9 September 2026 order and its limits.
Aditya Raheja v. Omkara Assets Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. & Ors
Aditya Raheja v Omkara: NCLT’s 3 September 2026 order distinguishes disputed debt figures from a supported perjury-referral case and preserves the CrPC/BNSS posture.
Anurag Gupta’s rejected repayment plan: NCLT Mumbai ended the personal resolution process on 2 September 2026 while bankruptcy remained a separate application.
RDB Realty & Infrastructure Limited v. Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Authority (UPSIDA)
RDB Realty v UPSIDA: NCLT Allahabad ordered refund of ₹35,31,779 on 2 September 2026, distinguishing old corporate dues from auction-transfer obligations.