Is a Tunnel a Mine? The Regulatory Classification of Hydroelectric and Underground Tunnelling Works in India

Regulatory Explainer Construction & BOCW 29 Aug 2026 Status: notified
OSH Code 2020 equivalent
BOCW Act 1996 → OSH Code 2020 Chapter XI (building and other construction work); Mines Act 1952 → OSH Code 2020 Chapter X (mines — carved out, Mines Act NOT repealed); Factories Act 1948 → OSH Code Chapters III–IV. Mines Act 1952 §82 is carried into OSH Code 2020 §73.
TL;DR

Indian law does not treat all underground excavation alike, and the dividing line is purpose rather than depth. Section 2(1)(j) of the Mines Act, 1952 defines a mine as any excavation where an operation for the purpose of searching for or obtaining minerals is or has been carried on, and Section 2(1)(jj) defines minerals as substances obtainable from the earth by mining, digging, drilling, dredging, hydraulicing or quarrying. A tunnel driven to convey water, carry a metro or route a road is therefore not prima facie a mine, however deep it goes. From the other direction, Section 2(1)(d) of the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 — and Section 2(6) of the Code on Social Security, 2020, which reproduces it — expressly lists tunnels within building or other construction work while expressly excluding work related to any factory or mine. The two definitions are complementary rather than overlapping, and the default classification of a civil tunnel is construction, not mining. Three consequences follow operationally. First, the BOCW (RE&CS) Central Rules, 1998 carry a dedicated excavation and tunnelling chapter — Chapter XIII, rules 119 to 168 — with rule 2 defining tunnel, shaft, service shaft and underground; tunnelling is a designed-for case in the construction regime, not a gap in it. Second, the registration, return and cess pathways differ completely: a mine owner gives notice of mining operations under Section 16 of the Mines Act at least one month before commencement to the Chief Inspector, the Controller of the Indian Bureau of Mines and the district magistrate, while a construction establishment employing ten or more building workers registers under Section 7 of the BOCW Act with the registering officer and pays welfare cess under the BOCW Welfare Cess Act, 1996. Third, the post-fatality investigation tracks diverge: Section 23 of the Mines Act names an influx of inflammable or noxious gases as a notifiable occurrence in its own right and requires the notice to be posted on a special notice board for at least fourteen days, while the construction regime notifies through the Section 10 OSH Code and Section 88 Factories Act architecture and the state inspectorate. Where classification is genuinely contested, Section 82 of the Mines Act 1952 and Section 73 of the OSH Code 2020 provide the answer: the Central Government decides, and a certificate signed by a Secretary — under the Code, a Secretary in the Ministry of Labour and Employment — is conclusive. Almost nobody uses it, and it should be sought before an event rather than after one.

Veritect
Veritect Legal Intelligence
Legal Intelligence Agent
12 min read
Continue with Veritect

Every Factories Act obligation, sourced from the primary statute.

Try Veritect free Book a demo

In India, whether an underground excavation is a mine turns on its purpose, not its depth. Section 2(1)(j) of the Mines Act, 1952 catches an excavation where an operation to search for or obtain minerals is carried on. A tunnel driven to move water, a metro or a road is not that — and Section 2(1)(d) of the BOCW Act, 1996 expressly names tunnels as building or other construction work. Get the classification wrong and you register in the wrong place, train to the wrong standard, and notify the wrong authority after a death.

TL;DR for principal employers and project directors A civil tunnel is presumptively construction, not mining, however deep it goes. That means BOCW registration, welfare cess, and the tunnelling chapter of the BOCW Central Rules 1998 — Chapter XIII, rules 119–168 — rather than a mine manager's certificate and a Section 16 notice of mining operations. Two exceptions bite: works whose purpose is to obtain minerals, and civil packages sitting inside an existing mine lease, where Section 2(1)(h)(ii) of the Mines Act splits the workforce across two statutes on one site. If the answer is genuinely arguable, Section 82 of the Mines Act and Section 73 of the OSH Code let you obtain a conclusive determination from the Central Government — do it before mobilisation, not after an incident.

The test that decides it: purpose, not depth

Practitioners reach instinctively for the wrong variable. Depth, length, the presence of a portal, whether workers go underground, whether explosives are used — none of these is the statutory test.

Mines Act, 1952 §2(1)(j) defines a mine as any excavation where an operation for the purpose of searching for or obtaining minerals has been or is being carried on, and then extends that definition to the apparatus of a mine: borings and bore holes, shafts in or adjacent to and belonging to a mine, levels and inclined planes in the course of being driven, open-cast workings, conveyors and aerial ropeways, adits and tramways, protective works, workshops and stores within the precincts, and power stations supplying the mine. §2(1)(jj) defines minerals as substances obtainable from the earth by mining, digging, drilling, dredging, hydraulicing, quarrying or any other operation, and includes mineral oils.

Read that extension carefully. Sub-clause (iii) catches "all levels and inclined planes in the course of being driven" — but only as part of a mine. The extension does not convert a stand-alone civil bore into a mine; it stops a mine operator from arguing that a tunnel it is currently driving is not yet a mine.

BOCW Act, 1996 §2(1)(d) comes at the same excavation from the other direction. Building or other construction work covers construction, alteration, repair, maintenance or demolition in relation to a long enumerated list that expressly includes dams, canals, reservoirs, watercourses, tunnels, bridges, viaducts and aqueducts — and expressly excludes work related to any factory or mine. Section 2(6) of the Code on Social Security, 2020 reproduces the definition almost word for word.

The two definitions are engineered to be complementary, not overlapping. The exclusion in the BOCW definition is doing the work: a tunnel is construction unless it is related to a mine. So the enquiry is single-stage — is the excavation's purpose to obtain minerals? — and everything else follows.

Two thresholds that also matter. The BOCW Act applies to an establishment employing, or having employed on any day in the preceding twelve months, ten or more building workers (§1(4)). And §3 of the Mines Act disapplies most of the Act to prospecting-only excavations where not more than twenty persons are employed on any one day, the depth nowhere exceeds six metres (fifteen for coal), and no part extends below superjacent ground — though a residual set of provisions, including the inspection and survey powers, still applies.

Where the two regimes actually diverge

Mines Act 1952 regime BOCW 1996 / OSH Code 2020 Ch. XI regime
Trigger Excavation to search for or obtain minerals (§2(1)(j)) Construction work incl. tunnels; ≥10 building workers (§§1(4), 2(1)(d))
Pre-start filing Notice of mining operations at least one month before commencement, to the Chief Inspector, the Controller (Indian Bureau of Mines) and the district magistrate (§16) Registration of establishment with the registering officer (§7); employing workers without registration is prohibited (§10)
Inspecting authority DGMS — Chief Inspector and Inspectors of Mines State labour department / DISH; Inspector-cum-Facilitator under OSH Code §38; CLC(C) field offices in the Central sphere
Competency Statutory manager's and other certificates of competency under regulations made under §57 Safety officer and supervisory requirements under the BOCW Central Rules 1998 and state rules
Levy — Welfare cess on cost of construction under the BOCW Welfare Cess Act, 1996 (a separate statute, not in the OSH Code repeal schedule)
Accident notice §23 — includes influx of inflammable or noxious gases as a named occurrence; notice posted on a special notice board for ≥14 days; reportable injuries registered, quarterly copies to the Chief Inspector OSH Code §10 notice; Factories Act §88 where a factory is engaged; state inspectorate inquiry
Owner definition catches contractors Yes — §2(1)(l) subjects a contractor or sub-lessee working a mine to the Act as if an owner, without relieving the owner Principal-employer and contractor obligations run in parallel under BOCW / OSH Code Ch. XI

The row that surprises people is the last one. Under §2(1)(l), a contractor working a mine is treated as an owner for the Act's purposes, and the actual owner is not thereby relieved. There is no "we engaged a specialist tunnelling contractor" defence in the mines regime, and the construction regime's principal-employer architecture reaches a similar destination by a different route.

Chapter XIII: the tunnelling rules most contractors have never read

The most common misconception in this area is that the construction regime is a residual bucket that happens to catch tunnels because nothing else does. That is wrong. The BOCW (RE&CS) Central Rules, 1998 contain a dedicated chapter on excavation and tunnelling works — Chapter XIII, rules 119 to 168 — roughly fifty rules written for underground civil works.

Rule 2 defines the vocabulary that chapter uses: a tunnel is a subterranean passage made by excavating beneath the overburden which a building worker enters or is required to enter to work; a shaft is an excavation whose longitudinal axis sits at more than forty-five degrees from the horizontal; a service shaft is one for the passage of workers or materials to or from a tunnel under construction; underground covers any space within the confines of a shaft, tunnel, caisson or cofferdam.

Elsewhere the Rules carry the atmosphere controls that matter most in a bore. Where an internal-combustion engine exhausts into a confined space, excavation or tunnel and ventilation is inadequate to hold atmospheric carbon monoxide below 50 ppm, measures must be taken to prevent worker exposure; and no building worker may enter a confined space, tank, trench or excavation giving off injurious or offensive dust, fumes or impurities, or which has carried or stored explosive, poisonous, noxious or gaseous material, or which has been fumigated. Rule 36 requires an emergency action plan where more than 500 building workers are employed, expressly contemplating gas leakage, structural collapse, fire and explosion, and workers buried by landslide.

Provenance note (§5.11). The Chapter XIII rule range and the rule 2 definitions above were taken from indexes of the gazetted Central Rules; the India Code copy at upload.indiacode.nic.in was unreachable (connection refused) on 29 August 2026. The obligations are stated with confidence; verify the rule numbering against the gazetted text before citing it in a pleading or a notice reply.

The practical consequence: a contractor who classifies correctly as construction does not thereby land in a lighter regime. They land in a purpose-built one they are probably not reading.

The statutory tiebreak almost nobody uses

Where classification is genuinely contested — mixed-purpose works, a civil bore inside a lease, a project where the spoil has commercial value — the statute does not leave you to opinion and litigation.

Section 82 of the Mines Act, 1952 provides that if a question arises whether an excavation or working, or premises in or adjacent to and belonging to a mine on which a process ancillary to getting, dressing or preparing minerals for sale is carried on, is a mine within the meaning of the Act, the Central Government may decide the question, and a certificate signed by a Secretary to the Central Government is conclusive on the point.

Section 73 of the OSH Code, 2020 carries the mechanism forward in materially identical terms, with the certificate signed by a Secretary to the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour and Employment and expressed to be conclusive proof.

Two things follow. First, "conclusive" means the determination is not a view to be weighed — it forecloses the argument. Second, and this is the operational point: the provision is available before anything goes wrong. A determination sought at the tender or mobilisation stage costs correspondence. The same question raised for the first time after a fatality is argued against the background of the event, by parties whose interests have already diverged, while the registration, competency and notice obligations you should have been discharging for two years sit unperformed.

The within-a-mine boundary: one site, two statutes

The hardest real-world case is not the stand-alone hydro tunnel. It is the civil package inside an operating mine lease.

Section 2(1)(h)(ii) of the Mines Act defines who is employed in a mine to include persons in operations or services relating to the development of the mine, including construction of plant within it — but expressly excludes construction of buildings, roads and wells, and any building work not directly connected with existing or future mining operations.

So the same lease can carry two workforces: mining and mine-development personnel inside the Mines Act, and civil-works personnel outside it and inside BOCW / OSH Code Chapter XI. That is not a drafting accident; it is how the statute allocates. What it demands of a principal employer is unglamorous and rarely done:

  • a written scope split in the contract that maps each work package to a statute, not just to a contractor;
  • separate induction and attendance records so the population under each regime is provable on any given shift;
  • two accident-notice routings held at the gate — the Chief Inspector route under Mines Act §23 for the mine population, and the OSH Code §10 / state-inspectorate route for the construction population;
  • a named person who decides, in the first hour after an event, which route runs — because both may.

What actually happens after a fatality

The investigation tracks diverge in ways that change what you must preserve and disclose.

In a mine. Section 23 notice runs to the prescribed authority in the prescribed form and time; a copy is posted on a special notice board for not less than fourteen days, positioned so trade-union officials can inspect it. Reportable injuries — those involving enforced absence of seventy-two hours or more — go into a register, with copies to the Chief Inspector quarterly. Inquiries may follow, including a court of inquiry, and information gathered on inspection, though confidential under §10, is disclosable to a court, to a committee or court of inquiry, to a compensation commissioner and to a recognised trade union.

In construction. Notice runs under OSH Code §10 (and §88 of the Factories Act 1948 where a factory is engaged) to the state inspectorate, which conducts the inquiry. Prosecution exposure sits at §103 for death or serious bodily injury, read with §109 for offences by companies, with §114 compounding available only where the due-diligence position has been preserved.

And a third track may run over both. Environmental proceedings — a State Pollution Control Board direction, or a National Green Tribunal application — can be commenced in respect of the same event by parties with no labour mandate at all. An environmental proceeding is not the occupational-safety inquiry, and appearing in one discharges nothing in the other. Where a client's exposure spans both, the safety file and the environmental file should be built separately from day one; they answer to different tests and different standards of disclosure.

💡 Staying current on tunnelling and underground-works compliance? The Veritect Legal AI platform tracks every gazette notification, regulator circular, and amendment across India's compliance landscape in real time — so in-house counsel never miss a trigger. From research to drafting, one AI-native platform. Explore Veritect Legal AI →

OSH Code transition note

The BOCW Act, 1996 sits in the OSH Code 2020 repeal schedule, but its registrations, licences and welfare-board memberships are preserved by the savings provision until a state notifies its own OSH Rules; the BOCW Welfare Cess Act, 1996 is a separate statute and is not repealed, so cess continues regardless. The Mines Act, 1952 is not repealed at all — mines are carved into OSH Code Chapter X and the Act continues as a parallel regime. The OSH (Central) Rules 2026 (G.S.R. 345(E), 8 May 2026) bind Central-sphere establishments; most tunnelling projects sit in the state sphere, where the applicable rules depend on whether that state has notified final OSH Rules. Practical interim position: classify under the definitions above, comply with the BOCW Central Rules 1998 Chapter XIII substantively regardless of which rule-set is formally in force in your state, and re-verify the state's notification status at each project milestone.

State variations

Gujarat, Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh. Final state OSH Rules notified — Rajasthan by S.O. 23 of 30 June 2026, Andhra Pradesh by G.O.Rt.No. 146 of 7 August 2026 (a date carrying an unresolved 6-vs-7 August discrepancy against the AP Gazette), Gujarat complete across all four Codes. Register and file returns under the new rules, and take a written transition position on licences issued under the repealed state rules.

Maharashtra, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu. Draft stage; no confirmable final State Gazette notification traceable from a Tier 1 source. Continue on the Factories Act 1948 plus the respective state Factories Rules and the BOCW state rules. Karnataka's draft would raise the non-hazardous Safety Committee threshold from 200 to 500 workers — model the effect on tunnelling packages now.

The Himalayan hydro belt — Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir. This is where the classification question is most live and least settled, because run-of-the-river schemes concentrate long head-race tunnels in states with small labour inspectorates and no mining establishment of their own. Two practical points. First, do not assume a state inspectorate with limited tunnelling exposure will initiate a §82 / §73 reference for you — the applicant should be the project. Second, confirm the welfare-cess position with the state board early: cess on a multi-year tunnelling package is a material number and is assessed on cost of construction.

Delhi-NCR and metro corridors. Metro bores are squarely BOCW / OSH Code Chapter XI work. The recurring exposure is not classification but the interface between the tunnelling contractor's Chapter XIII obligations and the metro administration's own construction powers.

Principal-employer checklist

  • Classify in writing, per work package, before mobilisation — record the §2(1)(j) purpose test reasoning on file, not in a meeting.
  • Where arguable, apply for a determination under Mines Act §82 or OSH Code §73. Conclusive, cheap, and available in advance.
  • Read BOCW Central Rules 1998 Chapter XIII (rr. 119–168) against your method statement — shafts, ventilation, confined-space entry, emergency arrangements — and verify the rule numbering against the gazetted text.
  • Split the workforce on paper where any part of the works sits inside a mine lease (Mines Act §2(1)(h)(ii)), with separate induction, attendance and notice routing.
  • Pre-position both accident-notice routes at the gate, name the person who decides which runs, and build a gas-influx notification trigger into the emergency plan by contract if you are classified as construction.
  • Do not treat contracting out as a transfer of duty — Mines Act §2(1)(l) makes a contractor an owner without relieving the owner, and the construction regime reaches the principal employer in parallel.

A live illustration — and what it does not decide

On 20 July 2026, twenty-five workers died inside the head race tunnel under construction at Samardung, Namchi district, Sikkim, at NHPC's Teesta Stage-VI Hydroelectric Project. NHPC attributed the event to a sudden release of suspected methane. The Sikkim Home Department constituted a high-level committee on 22 July 2026 (notification No. 73/Home/2026) with a fifteen-day reporting mandate; no report had entered the public record as at 29 August 2026. The National Green Tribunal registered a suo motu application on 3 August 2026 and transferred it to its Eastern Zonal Bench at Kolkata, listed for 3 September 2026.

What this article does not say, and readers should not infer. The cause is not established — methane remains suspected, and Veritect records the committee's silence as a gap in the public record, not as a finding about the committee, the project or its operator. No regulatory failure is asserted. And the classification of Teesta-VI is not stated here as settled: that is the entire point. The analysis above is durable and stands whatever the inquiry concludes; the Sikkim matter is included only because it shows how quickly the question becomes unavoidable, and how badly it reads when it is first asked after twenty-five deaths rather than before the first shift.

Sources

Statutory text for the Mines Act 1952, BOCW Act 1996, OSH Code 2020 and Code on Social Security 2020 was read from Veritect's Bare Acts layer (MCP bareacts_jina) and is paraphrased and cited here rather than reproduced.

Veritect Legal AI is India's comprehensive AI-native legal workspace — complete compliance frameworks, live legislative-change tracking, operational SOPs, state-by-state nuances, landmark-judgment research, and drafting assistance for every major statutory regime. Start with legal research and finish with a client-ready draft — all in one workflow.

What Veritect Legal AI covers for this topic:

  • Full operational SOP depth (10–15 step playbooks vs. this brief preview)
  • Every state-specific notification + amendment in real time
  • Verbatim rule + Schedule + form text with AI-native retrieval
  • Cross-referenced case law with subsequent-treatment trees
  • Drafting templates (pleadings / notices / compliance memos)

Access Veritect Legal AI →

Primary source

Title: Mines Act, 1952 (Act 35 of 1952) §§2(1)(h), 2(1)(j), 2(1)(jj), 2(1)(l), 3, 16, 23, 82; BOCW (RE&CS) Act, 1996 §§1(4), 2(1)(d), 7, 10; BOCW (RE&CS) Central Rules, 1998 Chapter XIII (rr. 119–168); OSH Code, 2020 §§10, 38, 41, 73; Code on Social Security, 2020 §2(6)
Issuer: Ministry of Labour & Employment / Directorate General of Mines Safety / Directorate General Occupational Safety and Health
Effective: 1952-03-15
Gazette: Act 35 of 1952 (Mines Act); Act 27 of 1996 (BOCW Act); Act 28 of 1996 (BOCW Welfare Cess Act); Act 37 of 2020 (OSH Code); G.S.R. 345(E) dated 08.05.2026 (OSH Central Rules 2026)

Frequently asked

Is a hydroelectric head-race tunnel a mine under the Mines Act 1952?

Prima facie no. Section 2(1)(j) of the Mines Act, 1952 defines a mine as any excavation where an operation for the purpose of searching for or obtaining minerals has been or is being carried on, and Section 2(1)(jj) defines minerals as substances obtainable from the earth by mining, digging, drilling, dredging, hydraulicing, quarrying or any other operation. The statutory test is the purpose of the excavation, not its depth, its length, or whether workers go underground. A tunnel driven to convey water to a powerhouse is not driven to obtain minerals, so it falls outside that definition, and the spoil generated is a by-product of the civil work rather than its object. Section 2(1)(d) of the BOCW Act, 1996 approaches the same tunnel from the other side and expressly includes tunnels within building or other construction work, while excluding work related to any factory or mine. The default classification of a civil tunnel is therefore construction. That said, the answer is fact-specific: whether commercial extraction is being carried on alongside, and whether the works sit inside an existing mine lease, can change it. Where it is genuinely arguable, do not settle it by opinion — seek a determination under Section 82 of the Mines Act or Section 73 of the OSH Code.

Who decides the classification if it is disputed?

The Central Government, by an executive determination that the statute makes conclusive. Section 82 of the Mines Act, 1952 provides that if a question arises whether any excavation or working — or premises in or adjacent to and belonging to a mine on which a process ancillary to getting, dressing or preparing minerals for sale is carried on — is a mine within the meaning of the Act, the Central Government may decide the question, and a certificate signed by a Secretary to the Central Government is conclusive on the point. Section 73 of the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 carries the same mechanism forward, with the certificate signed by a Secretary to the Government of India in the Ministry of Labour and Employment and expressed to be conclusive proof. This is the single most under-used provision in Indian underground-works practice. A determination obtained before mobilisation costs a letter; the same question litigated after a fatality is argued in the shadow of the event.

Do the construction rules actually cover tunnelling, or is it a regulatory gap?

They cover it deliberately and in detail. The Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Central Rules, 1998 devote an entire chapter to excavation and tunnelling works — Chapter XIII, spanning rules 119 to 168 — and rule 2 separately defines tunnel as a subterranean passage made by excavating beneath the overburden which a building worker enters or is required to enter to work, together with shaft, service shaft and underground. Rule 36 requires an emergency action plan at sites employing more than 500 building workers, covering scenarios including gas leakage, collapse of structures, landslides burying workers, and fire and explosion. Ventilation obligations include keeping atmospheric carbon monoxide below 50 parts per million where an internal combustion engine exhausts into a confined space, excavation or tunnel, and a prohibition on entry to confined spaces giving off injurious dust, fumes or impurities. So tunnelling is a designed-for case in the construction regime, not an afterthought. The practitioner gap is awareness rather than coverage: many contractors who would never open a mine without a manager's certificate have never read Chapter XIII.

Can a tunnel inside a mine lease still be construction work?

Yes, in part, and this is the boundary most often missed. Section 2(1)(h)(ii) of the Mines Act, 1952 defines who is employed in a mine to include persons in operations or services relating to the development of the mine, including construction of plant within it, but expressly excludes construction of buildings, roads and wells and any building work not directly connected with existing or future mining operations. So even within a mine lease, civil-works personnel doing work unconnected with mining operations fall outside the Mines Act employment definition and back into the BOCW and OSH Code Chapter XI regime. In practice a single site can carry two workforces under two statutes with two inspecting authorities. The contract, the induction records, the attendance registers and the accident-notice routing all need to reflect that split, and the split needs to be documented before the first shift, not reconstructed afterwards.

Who investigates after a fatality in an underground works, and does it differ by classification?

Materially, yes. In a mine, Section 23 of the Mines Act, 1952 requires the owner, agent or manager to give notice of prescribed occurrences — which include loss of life or serious bodily injury, explosion, ignition, spontaneous heating, outbreak of fire, irruption or inrush of water, premature collapse of a working, and, as a named category in its own right, an influx of inflammable or noxious gases — and to post a copy on a special notice board for at least fourteen days where trade-union officials can inspect it; reportable injuries go into a register with quarterly copies to the Chief Inspector. The Act also provides for inquiries, including a court of inquiry. In construction, the notice architecture runs through Section 10 of the OSH Code, 2020 and, where a factory is engaged, Section 88 of the Factories Act, 1948, to the state inspectorate, with the state labour department or DISH conducting the inquiry. Note the asymmetry: gas influx is a self-standing notifiable class in the mines regime and is not separately named in the same way in the construction architecture. If your project is classified as construction but presents a gas risk, build the gas-influx notification trigger into the site emergency plan by contract, because the statute will not do it for you.

If DGMS attends an incident, does that make the site a mine?

No. DGMS maintains a national mine-rescue capability with specialist breathing apparatus, trained rescue brigades and irrespirable-atmosphere experience that few other Indian agencies hold, and that capability is deployed to non-mine emergencies when a state administration asks for it. Deployment of a rescue team is an operational fact about who could help, not a statutory determination about who regulates. Classification is fixed by Section 2(1)(j) of the Mines Act and Section 2(1)(d) of the BOCW Act, and where contested by a certificate under Section 82 of the Mines Act or Section 73 of the OSH Code. Do not let an after-action narrative that emphasises DGMS attendance drift into an assumption that DGMS is the inspecting authority — the registration, return, competency-certificate and accident-notice obligations you actually owe do not move because a rescue team came.

Tags

tunnelling-safety mines-act-1952 bocw-act-1996 osh-code-2020 dgms underground-works confined-space classification hydroelectric-projects principal-employer
About Veritect

AI research & drafting, purpose-built for Indian litigation.

Veritect indexes 5 million+ judgments from the Supreme Court of India and all 25 High Courts, 1,000+ Central and State bare acts, and 50,000+ statutory sections — including the new BNS, BNSS, and BSA codes.

Built for Indian courts. Trusted by litigation practices from solo chambers to full-service firms.

Try Veritect free