Executive Summary
Wind energy is India's second-largest renewable energy source (after solar), with unique legal and regulatory frameworks. Understanding wind power laws is critical for developers, investors, and energy practitioners:
- Installed Capacity: ~45 GW (2024), target 140 GW by 2030
- Regulatory Framework: MNRE wind power policy, SERC tariff regulations
- PPAs: Long-term wind PPAs, forecasting and scheduling
- Repowering: Replacing old turbines with modern, high-capacity WTGs
- Offshore Wind: Emerging sector, separate regulatory framework
This guide examines wind energy policies, PPA structures, repowering regulations, and offshore wind framework.
1. Statutory Framework
Electricity Act, 2003
| Section |
Provision |
| Section 86(1)(e) |
SERC to promote renewable energy including wind |
| Section 62 |
Tariff determination for wind power |
| Section 63 |
Competitive bidding for wind power procurement |
MNRE Wind Power Policies
| Policy |
Year |
Key Feature |
| National Wind-Solar Hybrid Policy |
2018 |
Promote hybrid projects |
| Offshore Wind Policy |
2015 (revised 2022) |
Offshore wind development framework |
| Repowering Policy |
2016 |
Replace old turbines |
| National Wind Power Programme |
Ongoing |
Capacity addition support |
2. Wind Energy PPA Framework
Wind Power Purchase Agreements
| PPA Type |
Tenure |
Tariff Mechanism |
| SECI/NTPC Pooled |
25 years |
Competitive bidding (Rs 2.50-3.50/kWh) |
| State discom bilateral |
20-25 years |
SERC-determined feed-in tariff (Rs 3.00-4.50/kWh) |
| Captive/group captive |
- |
No PPA, self-consumption |
| Merchant |
- |
Short-term market sale |
Wind Tariff Determination (SERC)
| Component |
Calculation |
| Levelized tariff |
All-inclusive Rs/kWh (capex, O&M, ROE, debt) |
| CUF (Capacity Utilization Factor) |
25-35% (site-dependent) |
| O&M escalation |
3-5% annual |
| Useful life |
25 years |
| Debt-equity ratio |
70:30 |
| ROE |
14-16% |
3. Wind Resource Assessment and Site Allocation
Wind Zones in India
| Zone |
States |
Wind Potential (GW) |
Capacity Factor (%) |
| Western |
Gujarat, Maharashtra |
100+ |
25-30% |
| Southern |
Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh |
150+ |
30-35% |
| Northern |
Rajasthan |
50+ |
20-25% |
| Offshore |
Gujarat, Tamil Nadu |
70+ |
35-40% |
Wind Site Allocation Process
| Stage |
Timeline |
Activity |
| 1 |
Month 0 |
Expression of Interest (EOI) to state nodal agency |
| 2 |
Month 1-3 |
Site allocation (competitive or FCFS) |
| 3 |
Month 4-6 |
Land acquisition, wind resource study |
| 4 |
Month 7-12 |
Environmental clearance, forest clearance |
| 5 |
Year 1-2 |
Project construction |
| 6 |
Year 2-3 |
Commissioning, PPA execution |
4. Forecasting and Scheduling for Wind Power
Forecasting Obligations
| Aspect |
Requirement |
| Applicability |
All wind projects (any size) |
| Forecast type |
Day-ahead, intra-day (4 revisions) |
| Accuracy target |
±15% deviation band |
| Penalty |
20-30% of deviation cost |
| QCA (Qualified Coordinating Agency) |
SECI QCA or private QCA |
Deviation Settlement Mechanism (DSM)
| Deviation |
Penalty Rate |
| <10% |
Nil |
| 10-15% |
10% of deviation energy value |
| >15% |
30% of deviation energy value |
5. Wind Energy Repowering Policy
Repowering Framework (MNRE, 2016)
| Aspect |
Details |
| Objective |
Replace old turbines (<1 MW) with modern (>2 MW) |
| Eligible turbines |
>10 years old |
| Capacity enhancement |
2-3x capacity with modern turbines |
| Land reuse |
Same land, optimized layout |
| Incentive |
Priority PPA, accelerated depreciation |
Repowering Benefits
| Benefit |
Old Turbine (500 kW) |
Repowered (2 MW) |
Improvement |
| Capacity |
500 kW |
2,000 kW |
4x |
| Annual generation |
1.2 MU (27% CUF) |
6.0 MU (34% CUF) |
5x |
| O&M cost |
Rs 30 lakhs/MW |
Rs 15 lakhs/MW |
50% reduction |
| Downtime |
15% |
5% |
Better reliability |
Repowering Application Process
| Stage |
Timeline |
Activity |
| 1 |
Month 0 |
Apply to state nodal agency with old WTG details |
| 2 |
Month 1-2 |
Technical feasibility, grid capacity assessment |
| 3 |
Month 3-6 |
Environmental compliance update |
| 4 |
Month 6 |
Decommissioning of old turbines |
| 5 |
Month 7-12 |
Installation of new turbines |
| 6 |
Month 13 |
Commissioning, PPA amendment |
6. Wind-Solar Hybrid Projects
National Wind-Solar Hybrid Policy, 2018
| Aspect |
Provision |
| Definition |
Wind + Solar in same location, common transmission |
| Capacity mix |
Minimum 25% of smaller resource |
| Benefit |
Optimized land use, better grid stability |
| Tariff |
Hybrid tariff (blended or technology-specific) |
| Transmission |
Shared evacuation infrastructure |
Hybrid Project Benefits
| Benefit |
Explanation |
| Higher CUF |
Wind (night/monsoon) + Solar (day) → 35-40% combined CUF |
| Grid stability |
Complementary generation profiles |
| Land optimization |
Same land hosts both technologies |
| Transmission savings |
Single interconnection, pooling |
7. Offshore Wind Energy Framework
Offshore Wind Policy, 2022 (Revised)
| Aspect |
Details |
| Target |
30 GW by 2030 |
| Zones identified |
Gujarat (Kutch), Tamil Nadu (Gulf of Mannar) |
| Technology |
Fixed-bottom (up to 60m depth), floating (>60m) |
| Nodal agency |
National Institute of Wind Energy (NIWE) |
| Seabed lease |
Competitive bidding, 30-year lease |
Offshore vs. Onshore Wind
| Parameter |
Onshore |
Offshore |
| Capacity factor |
25-35% |
40-50% |
| Turbine size |
2-3 MW |
8-15 MW |
| Installation cost |
Rs 6-7 crore/MW |
Rs 12-15 crore/MW |
| O&M complexity |
Low |
High (marine environment) |
| Land acquisition |
Required |
Seabed lease |
Offshore Wind Regulatory Challenges
| Challenge |
Status |
| Maritime clearances |
Coordination with Navy, Coast Guard |
| Transmission evacuation |
Dedicated offshore substations needed |
| Tariff viability |
Higher cost requires premium tariff or VGF |
| Supply chain |
No domestic offshore turbine manufacturing |
8. Wind Energy Transmission and Evacuation
Pooling Substations
| Aspect |
Details |
| Purpose |
Aggregate wind farms, single ISTS/STU connection |
| Typical capacity |
500-1,000 MW |
| Cost sharing |
Pro-rata among connected generators |
| Examples |
Pooling stations in Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Rajasthan |
Green Energy Corridors for Wind
| Corridor |
States |
Capacity (MW) |
Status |
| Green Corridor Phase-I |
Tamil Nadu, Rajasthan, Karnataka |
9,700 |
Operational |
| Green Corridor Phase-II |
All wind states |
20,000 |
Under construction |
9. Compliance Checklist for Wind Projects
Pre-Commissioning
Post-Commissioning
10. Repowering Case Study
Example: Tamil Nadu Wind Repowering
Old Wind Farm (Year 2000):
- 50 turbines × 500 kW = 25 MW
- CUF: 27%
- Annual generation: 59 MU
- O&M cost: Rs 75 lakhs (Rs 30 lakhs/MW)
Repowered Wind Farm (Year 2023):
- 10 turbines × 2.5 MW = 25 MW
- CUF: 34%
- Annual generation: 74 MU
- O&M cost: Rs 38 lakhs (Rs 15 lakhs/MW)
Benefits:
- Generation increase: 15 MU (25% improvement)
- O&M savings: Rs 37 lakhs annually
- Reduced downtime: 15% → 5%
- Land optimization: Freed up space for other uses
11. Key Takeaways for Practitioners
Forecasting is Mandatory: All wind projects must forecast—engage SECI QCA or private QCA to minimize deviation penalties.
Repowering Offers 4-5x Gains: Replacing old <1 MW turbines with modern 2-3 MW turbines multiplies generation and reduces O&M.
Hybrid Wind-Solar Boosts CUF: Combining wind (night/monsoon) and solar (day) increases combined CUF to 35-40%.
Offshore Wind is High-Cost, High-Reward: 40-50% CUF but Rs 12-15 crore/MW capex—requires tariff support or VGF.
Pooling Substations Save Costs: Shared transmission infrastructure reduces per-MW evacuation cost.
Green Corridors Prioritize Wind: Dedicated transmission schemes for wind-rich states—leverage for faster connectivity.
Captive Wind Exempts CSS: Group captive wind farms avoid cross-subsidy surcharge—cost-effective for industries.
Conclusion
Wind energy remains a cornerstone of India's renewable transition, with robust policy frameworks supporting onshore expansion, repowering of aging assets, and offshore wind exploration. The combination of competitive tariffs (Rs 2.50-3.50/kWh), forecasting and scheduling maturity, and transmission infrastructure development positions wind power as a reliable baseload renewable source. Practitioners must navigate state-specific site allocation, environmental clearances, and grid connectivity while leveraging repowering incentives and hybrid project opportunities. As offshore wind matures and repowering scales up, wind energy will continue delivering cost-effective, clean electricity for decades.